Hi Przemek,
2008-06-05 14:58 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/harbour-ce-spec
* harbour/harbour-w32-spec
* harbour/harbour.spec
* harbour/make_tgz.sh
* removed not longer used HBPP references, thanks to Adam
* added hbppgen to list of installed binaries for native builds
* removed hbppgen from cross builds
* harbour/source/pp/Makefile
* harbour/config/install.cf
* added hack to install also hbppgen
I do not want to make deeper modifications in non GNU makefiles
now.
Looks that now we are ready to rename hbppgen to hbpp. I would
like
I'll look into it.
to keep -w hbppgen option semantic as is. Does anyone find it as
a problem?
I've checked and I don't get the way it works now, maybe
it's just me. I might be wrong, but simply running
'hbppgen test.prg' does nothing, I have to use
'hbppgen test.prg -w', to get the .ppo. It's a little
strange to me :/ Also, the help text says: '-w write .ppo
input file', shouldn't it rather say 'output file'?
IMO, it would be intuitive if it would generate .ppo file
by default, and/or if -w would be a -w<file> option, like -o
and -v. But again, maybe I'm misunderstanding something,
I assumed hbpp is a similar tool to 'cpp' in BCC, plus it
has some extra features (-c, -v).
In any case, instead of not doing anything ('hbpp test.prg')
I think it would be helpful to show some message about
what's going on.
Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
