On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Petr Chornyj wrote: > >> hb_stackReturnItem() is more fast than making a copy of item. In many > >> cases hb_stackReturnItem() is OK. Maybe we can use hb_stackReturnItem() > >> for internal code and hb_itemNew( hb_stackReturnItem() ) for public API. > > pItem = hb_itemReturnCopy( pItem /* or NULL */ ) ? > hb_itemReturnCopy is typo ( I mean hb_itemReturn )? > Or it is a part new API?
Hi Peter, It was only a proposition of new function name. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
