On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:54:22 +0100 Anselm R Garbe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi there, > > On 2 December 2016 at 13:34, Mattias Andrée > <[email protected]> wrote: > > If it's actually need, the package could call strip on > > the binaries that fail, or the developer can call strip > > explicitly. If it's even possible symbols could be > > problem, it's so rare that it wouldn't be much of a > > headache to deal with. > > IMHO install has always been a bad idea and a good > example of violating the Unix philosophy. Hence my > suggestion would be to ban it completely from sbase. I would love to see install banned, but I think it's unpractical. Virtual all makefiles must be modified, and that is going to be a lot of work for any distro that chooses to uses sbase and what to have a lot of package available for their users. > > -Anselm >
pgpJca9I0LNdq.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
