Tampoco creo una decisión acertada lo de crear un nuevo sistema de paquetes, estoy de acuerdo con la variedad (Distros, pues al final todas usan uno de los sistemas de paquetes, pero al final es GNU/Linux), pero realmente GNU/Linux necesita otro sistema de paquetes? se alejan de los deb, en que están pensando? Voy a ir buscando una distro desde ya, para en ese entonces no me coja de sorpresa.
2013/5/9 Leodanis Pozo Ramos <lp...@echol.cupet.cu> > El 09/05/13 09:28, Dirección Municipal de Cultura Mella escribió: > > According to a recent message posted on the Ubuntu Devel mailing list by >> Colin Watson, Installer Team leader, *Ubuntu might get a new, simplified >> packaging format and app installer *which should make it easier for >> developers to get their software into Ubuntu. This *will target, at least >> initially, the Ubuntu phone/tablet but it should be usable elsewhere too, >> even on non-Ubuntu or non-Linux systems*. >> >> *The already existing packages won't change and Ubuntu will continue to >> use dpkg and apt, syncing with Debian and so on. * >> >> "*Click packages*" (the new packaging format) is aimed at making it >> easier to build packages for Ubuntu: no dependencies between applications, >> no maintainer scripts and each app will be installed in its own directory. >> >> >> The new package format needs a new installer and there's already a *proof >> of concept low-level app package installer* that's entirely new code - >> highlights of what it can do so far: >> >> * no dependencies between apps; single implicit dependency on the base >> system by way of a Click-Base-System field; >> * installs each app to an entirely separate directory; >> * entirely declarative: maintainer scripts are forbidden; >> * base package manager overhead, i.e. the time required to install a >> trivial package containing a single small file, is about 0.15 >> seconds on a newish x86 laptop and about 0.6 seconds on a Nexus 7 >> (and that's with the current prototype implementation in Python; a >> later implementation could be in C and would then be faster still); >> * not limited to installing as root, although there may be similar >> constraints elsewhere to ensure that apps can't edit their own code >> at run-time >> * packages built by feeding the intended output directory tree to a >> simple Python tool, plus a manifest.json file; >> * building packages requires only the Python standard library, with >> the intent that it should be possible to build these packages quite >> easily on non-Ubuntu or even non-Linux systems; >> * binary packaging format sufficiently similar to existing one that we >> could add support to higher-level tools with minimal effort; >> * strawman design for hooks into system packages, which will be >> entirely declarative from the app's point of view; >> * unit-tested from the start. >> >> >> The Ubuntu developers have also looked into similar existing tools such >> as Listaller >> <http://listaller.tenstral.**net/<http://listaller.tenstral.net/>> >> or 0install <http://0install.net/> but there are some things which they >> prefer to do differently; e.g.: Listaller is dependency-based and they >> prefer this to be as independent as possible and 0install would also need >> some system integration problems to be solved, so instead, they've decided >> to create a new installer. >> >> The proof of concept installer is currently under 300 lines of code >> (Python) and obviously, still needs work. The prototype will be ready in >> time for UDS <http://uds.ubuntu.com/> next week and there's also going >> to be an UDS session to discuss this. >> >> *For more info, see Colin Watson's message @ Ubuntu Devel mailing list < >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**archives/ubuntu-devel/2013-**May/037074.html<https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2013-May/037074.html> >> >. >> * >> >> Vaya, Ubuntu quiere parecerse a W2. Y eso de que no hace falta ser root > para instalar...pufff, adios seguridad... > > saludos, > > lpozo > > > -- > Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner > en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos, > y se considera que está limpio. > > ------------ próxima parte ------------ > Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... > URL: <http://listas.jovenclub.cu/**pipermail/gutl-l/attachments/** > 20130509/ba11582b/attachment.**html<http://listas.jovenclub.cu/pipermail/gutl-l/attachments/20130509/ba11582b/attachment.html> > > > > ______________________________**______________________________**__________ > Lista de correos del Grupo de Usuarios de Tecnologías Libres de Cuba. > Gutl-l@jovenclub.cu > https://listas.jovenclub.cu/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gutl-**l<https://listas.jovenclub.cu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gutl-l> > -- Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que está limpio. ------------ próxima parte ------------ Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: <http://listas.jovenclub.cu/pipermail/gutl-l/attachments/20130509/b5fb4425/attachment.html> ______________________________________________________________________ Lista de correos del Grupo de Usuarios de Tecnologías Libres de Cuba. Gutl-l@jovenclub.cu https://listas.jovenclub.cu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gutl-l
