Hi pinoaffe, pinoaffe <[email protected]> writes:
[...] > This, to me, seems like you are in fundamental disagreement with the GCD > process itself, since (to me) the goal of said process is almost always > to find outcomes which "most people are not completely satisfied with" > but which most people prefer over the current situation and which > everyone can live with. > > You seem to be opposed to compromise, whereas (to my mind) compromise is > the explicit goal of the process - every once in a blue moon it might in > theory happen that the document is "ideal" for (nearly) everyone, but > that is unrealistic if the document deals with a subject as contentious > as LLM use According to the document linked to explain consensus decision making in our manual (info "(guix) Making Decisions") [0]: Consensus involves looking for ‘win-win’ solutions that are acceptable to all. It is neither compromise nor unanimity – it aims to go further by weaving together everyone’s best ideas and key concerns – a process that often results in surprising and creative solutions, inspiring both the individual and the group as whole. [0] https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus -- Thanks, Maxim
