On Tue, 2026-07-28 at 14:14 +0200, Gabriel Wicki wrote: > I just think we need more time, because the matter is too sensitive. > >
Hi, I don’t think its fair to say we in this situation. You are the only person voicing your disapproval, I think it can only be said that you need more time. In that case, I suggest that you continue forwards with the consensus process meaning you create a new version of the GCD with the changes that you need and do the process once more. I feel strongly that I do not wish to contribute to Guix for as long as there is not a policy to ban vibecoded contributions. I do not feel that this process has been rushed, there have been litteraly months of discussion. Months of effort by Ludovic and hundreds of messages. It is really crazy to say “locking things behind another GCD”. You have just done this. Let’s just look forwards, please, produce a patch and let’s continue the process. Have a nice day and thank you again for the t-shirt, Noé > On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 01:45:34PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Disapproval in the deliberation has only one outcome. > Yes. The one outcome being: we need more time to discuss. > > > > I also object to the characterization of a community paralyzed by > > fear, a > > picture that you paint with your comment. > I understand and am sorry if I misrepresent what I perceived, but: > > > [...] It is uncertain if I can continue my contributions to Guix in > > the absence of a decision similar to what the discussions of GCD008 > > resulted in. This outcome was listed as one of the risks of not > > accepting the GCD. > This is exactly the emotion (fear) and time pressure I mentioned that > IMO drove the discussion. The matter is much too sensitive to let us > haste to not completely rock-solid decisions. > > We do need more time and rushing things to lock them behind the need > for > another GCD is (to me) worse than continuing where we are currently.
