Hi Thanos,
<#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
Thanos Apollo <[email protected]> writes:
Vagrant Cascadian <[email protected]> writes:
On 2026-05-05, pinoaffe wrote:
Vagrant Cascadian <[email protected]> writes:
I think even the GNU Hurd development has started using some
of these
technologies,
Do you have any source / more specific information on that? I
find this
quite saddening to be honest
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2026-02/msg00133.html
There did not seem to be much of any discussion on the list
about the
implications, at least at the time... although I do not really
follow
Hurd development, just saw it referenced via the fediverse...
ESR and other well known names are contributing to projects
using LLMs,
including Emacs[1].
I highly doubt Guix does not already have drive-by contributions
where
LLMs were used.
There are two issues:
- Should Guix allow contributions including LLM output?
- Should Guix label software it packages as containing LLM output?
This conversation is about the latter, but people keep bringing in
discussion about the former. They are different problems which
require different discussion, and different solutions.
Both are worth discussing, but the way the issues are overlapping
in this thread confuses the issues. I don’t mean to single you
out, many have done the same thing.
-- Ian
