Egun on, Ekaitz Zarraga <[email protected]> skribis:
> The main discussion line I see here focuses on a political approach, > policing, encouraging, or whatever you want to call it. > > I'm a simple man. A sinner, if you might. So I don't feel entitled to > tell people what to do. As far as I’m concerned, it’s not about telling people what to do. Instead it’s about deciding what to do as a project, this project being both technical and political. The distinction is crucial. As individuals we all make choices and compromises to make do. Nobody is expecting contributors to be “saints” or calling those who make compromises (which is all of us) “sinners” (continuing with the religious vocabulary uses). (I think the widespread RMS-style approach of pointing fingers, saying “what you’re doing is unethical!”, has alienated a large part of the population we’re claiming to “liberate” with free software.) > I believe, if we are going to collaborate we should care about each > other, and not only like "if you don't care about your PR don't expect > me to care" but in a deeper way: "what made you have to use AI?" > "wasn't documentation good enough?" "why don't you talk to me > instead?"[^1] I totally agree. > From my side: I'm out. I'm out of guix-devel, and will gradually stop > taking part on any governance discussion. I respect your choice but I hope you will reconsider. Thanks for your feedback, Ludo’.
