Simon Tournier <[email protected]> skribis: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 at 16:40, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As this discussion shows, we’ll probably need a policy as to what we >> accept in Guix: what packages we allow (is “open weight” good enough? >> what’s the Corresponding Source?), and how we deal with contributions. > > I think it soaps a slippery slope. How would you detect this > contribution using some inputs from LLMs?
All I said is that this needs to be formalized, there’s no slippery slope. The one thing I made clear in this thread and in previous discussions on Mastodon¹ is that I believe “policing” what people are doing would be counterproductive and plain wrong. Instead, I think we should set goals for what we’re building together and support one another because that’s what it will take to stay strong in the middle of this “AI” storm. Ludo’. ¹ Like this one: <https://toot.aquilenet.fr/@civodul/115843254728661799>.
