Hi!

Ekaitz Zarraga <[email protected]> skribis:

> A different story is if we actually want as a community to share our
> *opinion* about the usage of LLMs, or if we want to ask contributors
> to say if their contribution was made using LLMs just for adjusting
> the review criteria in those contributions (they could still lie,
> though).

That’s a good question.

As this discussion shows, we’ll probably need a policy as to what we
accept in Guix: what packages we allow (is “open weight” good enough?
what’s the Corresponding Source?), and how we deal with contributions.

One thing I wonder is whether the project should have an “opinion” on
generative AI in general and its relation to computer programming and
human creativity.  I do have an opinion :-) and the question is whether
taking a stance as a project is worth it and feasible.

Ludo’.

            • ... pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
            • ... Divya Ranjan
            • ... Simon Tournier
  • Re: Can a project... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
    • Re: Can a pr... Ludovic Courtès
    • Re: Can a pr... Ekaitz Zarraga
      • Re: Can ... Craig Brozefsky
      • Re: Can ... Ludovic Courtès
        • Re: ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
          • ... Ekaitz Zarraga
            • ... Anderson Torres
            • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
              • ... pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
              • ... Ludovic Courtès
              • ... jgart
              • ... Cayetano Santos
              • ... pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
              • ... Ludovic Courtès

Reply via email to