Hi Hilton,
Hilton Chain <hako@ultrarare.space> writes:
[...]
> But according to GNU Coding Standards, the following might be used instead:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix) <#:phases> [(target-riscv64?)]:
> Use
> correct Guile version for tests.
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> convention:
> - * changed file
> - () changed function or variable
> - [] conditional change
> - <> indicating the part changed
Indeed. That's something I had noticed when I first read carefully the
GNU ChangeLog style examples a long item ago. The parts we used
differently are often:
[]: More often than not used to denote object fields instead of
conditionals, e.g. [inputs]: Add x.
<>: It's gotten used more, but initially {} was used in place of it. I
still sometimes prefer {}, simply because Emacs allows me to
auto-complete inside curly braces and not inside <> (I'm sure that's
configurable though; it must be treating { as a word boundary and not <
or something).
> [] is added after <> because the condition happens within that part.
>
> Should this documented convention be followed instead, or we documenting the
> one
> currently used?
I'm not sure. The GNU ChangeLog itself is not too formally defined; it
seems the important part is matching it in spirit, not exact form.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
