Hilton Chain <hako@ultrarare.space> writes: > Hi Guix, > > An initial set of labels were added in > https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/issues/33. > > Documentation for labels are available here: > https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/user/labels/ > > Once created, an id will be assigned > e.g. https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/issues?labels=422985 > > Labels can be deleted, all its information can be edited as well. And > labels with duplicated names are allowed. (We should not make that > happen.) > > > Our current naming convention is "prefix + name": > > 1. prefix ends with '/' for exclusive labels, e.g. ‘kind/’, and '-' for > non-exclusive ones, e.g. ‘team-’. > 2. names follows the same convention for variable names. > > Below are the initial set of labels. > > - kind/bug > #e11d21 Confirmed bug reports. > - kind/moreinfo: > #fbca04 Need more information for further action. > - kind/wishlist > #009800 Feature and package requests. > - kind/wont-fix: > #000000 Out of scope. > > Labels for teams are added as well, descriptions from etc/teams.scm are > used. Currently they are labelled to pull requests manually, eventually > we should automate the process. > > #0052cc > - team-core > - team-... > > > For label proposals, please reply to this mail, with name, color and > description. > > Thanks
Hi Hilton, Could you add a user-reviewed tag, color #006400 (same as qa’s reviewed-looks-good)? Description: Reviewed and approved by a non-committer. It seems like user reviews on Codeberg don’t show from the list view, so it does not put the patches at the front like it used to do on qa.guix.gnu.org/patches. Adding this tag would help the patches that should be almost ready to go stand out and not be forgotten. The state of these patches means that they can only wait on a committer to look, there is nothing else left to do. The only issue I see with this is that non-committers can’t set tags, so it would have to be done like your team tags script, or permissions to set tags should be given to non-committers who ask for it. Currently I’d like to give this tag to the following: - https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/132 - https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/51 What do you think? Noé
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
