Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <gnu...@cyberdimension.org> writes: > In my case I didn't read the mailing list that often (I often do that > in batches), and so I found out quite recently about all that. > > Because of that, and given the amount of disruption of the GCD 002 if > it passes (it will probably change the demographics of Guix > contributors at least to some extent by making it unpractical for some > people to contribute, while at the same time making it easier for other > people to join) I think it would be a good idea to at least make a blog > post about it and inform as many current or potential contributors as > possible about the change proposal.
I support this. I also only check the mailing list periodically, and while I was tangentially aware about the GCD process & codeberg discussion, it's not entirely clear how to contribute my thoughts. A single organized blog post would make it much more approachable vs. parsing hundreds of emails across multiple split GCD-related threads to pick out what is the "definitive" process. (After writing the above paragraph I did track down the info-guix announcement which helps. I still believe a blog post is appropriate given the scope and nature of the changes.) If a blog post is written, hopefully it's soon. I imagine opinions posted near the end of the discussion period will have less importance as everyone else has already informally reached a consensus. -- Take it easy, Richard Sent Making my computer weirder one commit at a time.
