The absurdity of this claim relies on the assumption that the burden of self-reflection is supposed to be _only_ on the shoulders of Christopher, or anyone who doesn't agree with those who "feel the need".
What is stopping those who so strongly do feel the need for this change to _also_ undergo a similarly critical self-reflection of their position? Regards, On 20 February 2025 21:32:46 GMT, Vagrant Cascadian <vagr...@debian.org> wrote: >On 2025-02-18, Christopher Howard wrote: >> Personally, I believe the whole push to switch from "master" to "main" >> is politically correct nonsense, and a waste of time. Obviously a >> "master" branch in repository has nothing to do with slavery or >> political perspectives, but DEI proponents have a compulsive desire to >> eradicate from society and language anything that has some vague >> connection to what they find displeasing. >> >> If "main" is the default for new git repositories, I don't care and >> that is fine with me, but I see no need to rename leading branches on >> any existing projects. > >The fact that you see no need when obviously others do, might be time >better spent, in my humble opinion, by asking questions (internally or >externally) than making dismissive comments. > > >live well, > vagrant Divya Ranjan, Mathematics, Philosophy and Libre Software
