Hi, Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Sorry if my understanding is incorrect, but if we do not increase the > number of people with specific/dedicated/controlled write access, the > move to Codeberg is useless. Provocative on purpose. ;-) As I mentioned in the GCD under “Workflow”, at the Guix Days, and in the message you’re replying to, I think we should adapt our workflow to empower team members to merge (or queue) changes without being committers themselves. I gave the example of Nixpkgs, where package maintainers, who are not necessarily committers, can trigger merges for some changes that touch their packages and that pass a number of tests. I don’t have yet a clear idea of what workflow would work for us but I think we can take inspiration from Nixpkgs and many other projects that rely on automation to do empower people beyond committers. The good thing here is that we won’t have to reinvent the wheel. Ludo’.
