Given the current work in progress status of tooling at Codeberg side, would it be feasible to consider a period of time during which the two strategies overlap ? Kind of a testing cohabitation period.
For sure, this would imply manual intervention and some degree of overload to committers during this time, to keep the two repositories in sync: we should have to keep on accepting email patches, as well as new pull requests so as to compare benefits and drawbacks of each strategy, based on existing tooling. I’m asking because moving to a completely different approach, based on current obvious difficulties, seems to me like a relevant decision, which implications in terms of a non-return jump to unknown. As for today, qa, ci, auto patch checking, facilitating committers life and the like are the biggest obstacles to move forward, from my perspective. Remains to be tested that such a change improves current situation so as to compensate for the lack of flexibility it imposes. -- Cayetano Santos GnuPG Key: https://meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp FingerPrint: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
