On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 12:17:50PM +0100, Nicolas Graves wrote: > On 2024-10-28 12:02, Andreas Enge wrote: > > > Am Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 10:59:29AM +0100 schrieb Nicolas Graves: > >> Sorry I should have thought about it with the patch, let me know if > >> you'd wish I write this patch + news item. > > > > Well, I wondered whether or not to apply the patch, but since it had a > > CVE, I thought solving it would be the more urgent action. > > > > A patch and news item would be welcome, and I hope that someone using > > postgresql (maybe that is you? or Efraim who already replied?) can then > > chime in and provide a more substantial opinion than I could give. > > Done now in 74058. Indeed Efraim probably would have a more substantial > opinion, please go ahead and change the patches if you find a more > relevant approach! I added a comment about doing the migration > automatically with Guix, but I won't be able to handle that quickly > either.
No, I try to stay away from needing a database, I don't want to have to administer it. I just like being able to apply CVE patches. -- Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
