jbra...@dismail.de writes: > April 8, 2023 8:54 PM, "Ivan Sokolov" <ivan-p-soko...@ya.ru> wrote: > >> Bodertz <bode...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> I don't have strong feelings either way, and the change won't really >>> affect me too much, but what benefit is there in breaking things? From >>> what I understand from your message, users' configs will stop working in >>> a few months when 1.0.x releases (or with the macro would "kinda work"), >>> which is at least a short-term con, so what's the long-term benefit of >>> this change? Is GOOPS so bad a thing to require? >> >> If I understand correctly, that will allow Shepherd to run on GNU Mes, >> a Scheme interpreter written for Guix bootstraping. > > So by removing the Shepherd's dependency on GNU Mes, the Guix project > benefits by simplying its bootstrapping process?
Where did this come from? No, Mes is not a Shepherd's dependency, please read the quotes again.
