April 8, 2023 8:54 PM, "Ivan Sokolov" <ivan-p-soko...@ya.ru> wrote:
> Bodertz <bode...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I don't have strong feelings either way, and the change won't really >> affect me too much, but what benefit is there in breaking things? From >> what I understand from your message, users' configs will stop working in >> a few months when 1.0.x releases (or with the macro would "kinda work"), >> which is at least a short-term con, so what's the long-term benefit of >> this change? Is GOOPS so bad a thing to require? > > If I understand correctly, that will allow Shepherd to run on GNU Mes, > a Scheme interpreter written for Guix bootstraping. So by removing the Shepherd's dependency on GNU Mes, the Guix project benefits by simplying its bootstrapping process?
