Marius, Thank you for your work upgrading the core packages!
On the off chance that the following is helpful, in order to switch the build to GCC 11 or 12 I had to apply the patch (with the missing endif) from https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017#c12 You may have avoided or worked around this issue, but even though a different fix from the ticket was patched into our GCC 11.3 and 12.1, these would not bootstrap for me without that patch. Greg On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 3:49 PM Marius Bakke <mar...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Hi Guix, > > I tried switching to GCC 11 on the core-updates branch, but it fails > early when attempting to repack the GCC source code for GCC-BOOT0, > because some files in its test suite contains non-ASCII characters: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > [... unpacking ...] > patching file gcc/builtins.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 4623 with fuzz 1 (offset 1341 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 6097 with fuzz 2 (offset 2206 lines). > patching file gcc/gimple-fold.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 665 (offset 9 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 766 with fuzz 2 (offset 16 lines). > patching file libvtv/Makefile.in > Hunk #1 succeeded at 14 with fuzz 1 (offset -1 lines). > source is at 'gcc-11.3.0' > applying > '/gnu/store/g0ba4l825z9i4l1jd5cqvl6m09xicdwa-gcc-9-strmov-store-file-names.patch'... > applying > '/gnu/store/5705r4ajxl8lav1hz9xm19w75zdcz1n2-gcc-5.0-libvtv-runpath.patch'... > find-files: > gcc-11.3.0/gcc/testsuite/go.test/test/fixedbugs/issue27836.dir/Äfoo.go: No > such file or directory > Backtrace: > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > 465: 19 [fold #<procedure 143cb10 at ice-9/ftw.scm:451:38 (subdir > result+visited)> ...] > In ice-9/ftw.scm: > 452: 18 [#<procedure 143cb10 at ice-9/ftw.scm:451:38 (subdir > result+visited)> # #] > 450: 17 [loop "gcc" "gcc-11.3.0" ...] > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > 465: 16 [fold #<procedure 2375210 at ice-9/ftw.scm:451:38 (subdir > result+visited)> ...] > In ice-9/ftw.scm: > 452: 15 [#<procedure 2375210 at ice-9/ftw.scm:451:38 (subdir > result+visited)> # #] > 450: 14 [loop "testsuite" "gcc-11.3.0/gcc" ...] > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > 465: 13 [fold #<procedure ebad80 at ice-9/ftw.scm:451:38 (subdir > result+visited)> ...] > In ice-9/ftw.scm: > 452: 12 [#<procedure ebad80 at ice-9/ftw.scm:451:38 (subdir result+visited)> > # #] > 450: 11 [loop "go.test" "gcc-11.3.0/gcc/testsuite" ...] > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > 465: 10 [fold #<procedure 219a4b0 at ice-9/ftw.scm:451:38 (subdir > result+visited)> ...] > In ice-9/ftw.scm: > 452: 9 [#<procedure 219a4b0 at ice-9/ftw.scm:451:38 (subdir result+visited)> > # #] > 450: 8 [loop "test" "gcc-11.3.0/gcc/testsuite/go.test" ...] > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > 465: 7 [fold #<procedure 229ba80 at ice-9/ftw.scm:451:38 (subdir > result+visited)> ...] > In ice-9/ftw.scm: > 452: 6 [#<procedure 229ba80 at ice-9/ftw.scm:451:38 (subdir result+visited)> > # #] > 450: 5 [loop "fixedbugs" "gcc-11.3.0/gcc/testsuite/go.test/test" ...] > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > 465: 4 [fold #<procedure 20bab70 at ice-9/ftw.scm:451:38 (subdir > result+visited)> ...] > In ice-9/ftw.scm: > 452: 3 [#<procedure 20bab70 at ice-9/ftw.scm:451:38 (subdir result+visited)> > # #] > 474: 2 [loop "issue27836.dir" ...] > In guix/build/utils.scm: > 540: 1 [#<procedure d188e0 at guix/build/utils.scm:536:28 (file stat errno > result)> > "gcc-11.3.0/gcc/testsuite/go.test/test/fixedbugs/issue27836.dir/Äfoo.go" ...] > In unknown file: > ?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f "~A" ("find-files failed") #f] > > ERROR: In procedure scm-error: > ERROR: find-files failed > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Deleting these files also don't work for the same reason, even when > using the hex representation, i.e. (delete-file "\u00c4foo.go"), or with > DELETE-FILE-RECURSIVELY. > > One workaround is to avoid the use of BOOTSTRAP-ORIGIN by applying the > patches and snippet in phases, but that's suboptimal because it has to > be done for all of GCC-BOOT0, LIBSTDC++, and GCC-FINAL. > > I'll try this workaround to get things going, but hoping for better > suggestions! >
