Hi,
On 3/30/22 09:28, Andy Wingo wrote:
Too bad about all that other crap about checking whether the index is in
range and the field is boxed or not, though :-/ Probably there is a
better design...
Andy
For the index-out-of-range part, when I saw `record-accessor`, I thought
of it as similar to Racket's `make-struct-field-accessor`[1], which can
check the index just once, when the accessor is created, rather than
each time the accessor is used. That's (part of) what Racket's `struct`
form expands to.
Would it be reasonable to use `record-accessor` in the implementation of
SRFI 9?
-Philip
[1]:
https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/creatingmorestructs.html#%28def._%28%28quote._~23~25kernel%29._make-struct-field-accessor%29%29
