Hi, Andy Wingo <wi...@igalia.com> skribis:
> Here we see the first procedure which is the thunk that wraps the > expression. Then in the beginning of the procedure at L7 you can see > there is a check for struct?, which has to be dominated by a true > heap-object? check. Duplicate checks are elided. So if SRFI-9 added a > `struct?` check it wouldn't be more code; rather it would be less, > actually, because instead of branching to L38, you'd branch to L37. Oh very nice, thanks for the explanation! That ‘,optimize-cps’ command proves useful. So we can have better error reports with no performance penalty, Philip. Way to go! Ludo’.
