Taylan Kammer <taylan.kam...@gmail.com> writes: > On 20.02.2022 22:37, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> Taylan Kammer <taylan.kam...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Just one remark for them: most women I know would think twice before >>> spending time trying to get into a community whose rules intentionally >>> don't acknowledge sex-based discrimination. >> >> Honest question, because (IIUC) this is the whole point of having a CoC: >> >> Do those women believe that “… harassment-free experience for everyone, >> regardless of … gender identity and expression, … or sexual identity and >> orientation.” would not cover any potential harassment that they could >> be subjected to while participating in Guix’s community? > > If no characteristics were listed at all, it wouldn't matter, but if there's > a long list yet 'sex' is explicitly excluded, that seems rather hostile, > even if it doesn't mean that Guix maintainers would actually ignore > harassment that happened on the grounds of someone's sex. > > Happy to talk more about this off-list. As it stands I'm rather embarrassed > that this thread immediately blew up and wish I hadn't posted it at all now.
Ah okay, hadn't seen this post before I replied. It seems the issue is closed then. Look forward to everyone getting back to hacking. :)
