Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op zo 20-02-2022 om 19:05 [+0100]: > > Note: The upstream Contributor Covenant wouldn't want to include it > > because the author seems to have a peculiar world-view where they > > don't acknowledge that humans actually have a sex. I hope the Guix > > maintainers are more reasonable than that. :-) > Sorry, but tracking down the issue you submitted towards the > contributor covenant, it appears to me that you are the misguided > one. > The CoC already prohibits discrimination based on gender identity, > sexual identity and sexual orientation. If you identify your gender > as > your sex, whatever that might be, you are thereby already protected. > > The wording you chose (intentionally or otherwise) tries to > invalidate > other people's gender identity and thus violates the CoC.
Ignoring upstream's context and whether Taylan Kammer is misguided or not, listing sex among the list could be useful if a potential harasser H who understands the difference between sex and gender and knows that V has sex A not corresponding to gender B under current social convention, and H would harass V over their sex (but H is fine with V's gender). To me, this seems a rather contrived scenario though ... Greetings, Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
