October 27, 2021 6:51 PM, "Katherine Cox-Buday" <cox.katherin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > >> I think a major goal of the process would be to formalize a minimum >> and a maximum duration under which an RFC is under evaluation, and a >> mechanism to determine whether it’s accepted or withdrawn. > > I think it's a good idea. The only contribution I can give is that I would > not have known =guix > shell= was coming had I not been watching the patches list. So in addition to > formalizing what > you've mentioned, I suggest we also formalize a location to watch (guix-devel > seems logical?). That's why I didn't see guix shell coming. I don't follow guix patches... > -- > Katherine
