Wow! It does look very interesting, indeed! One of the reasons why I became so interested in Racket (not just PowerShell😅) is that it installed without a hitch in my corporate Windows. (I tried to install Haskell as well but it got stuck when it came to using Stack)
It is also interesting that the rash paper on the homepage http://willghatch.net/publications/rash-gpce-2018-preprint.pdf mentions PowerShell many times. 😄 Empowering the IT workers! Power to the workers!! 😄 -Yasu > On Feb 4, 2021, at 03:53, Bengt Richter <b...@bokr.com> wrote: > > Hi, > >> On +2021-02-03 02:28:26 +0100, zimoun wrote: >> Hi, >> Well, speaking about an >>> attempt to pull command >>> interpreters out of the 70s >> ads: <https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/lisprepl/> :-) >> (I previewed the talk and it is worth watching! Even, I previewed all >> the talks of the «room» and they are all inspired and inspiring, see you >> on Sunday. :-)) >> Cheers, >> simon > > [1] https://docs.racket-lang.org/rash/index.html > > If you have racket or raco at your command line, > rash is only one or two commands from interaction with you :) > > I.e., > racket -l rash/repl > and/or to install rash > raco pkg install rash > > A repo is at [2] > > [2] https://github.com/willghatch/racket-rash/blob/master/README.md > > Seems interesting, though I'm more into wayland innards right now, > so I haven't done anything rash :) > > -- > Regards, > Bengt Richter
