Hi Yasu, I don't think it'll be so simple. It appears, that nerd-fonts already includes – or at least has the potential to include – some non-free glyphs, which would in turn then be part of Cascadia. An instance would be pomicons [1], which are licensed as CC BY-NC-ND. A reviewer would first have to verify, that Cascadia is indeed wholly covered under the OFL or at least under a set of free licenses.
Yes, it sucks having to put that much effort into packaging a font, but if you just want to have a workable font for programming, there are probably better solutions than Cascadia, some of which are already packaged in Guix – e.g. font-fira-code. Regards, Leo [1] https://github.com/gabrielelana/pomicons Am Sonntag, den 10.01.2021, 19:11 +0900 schrieb Yasuaki Kudo: > Thank you for your comments! > > Because I don't have a lot of time, is it ok to just re-format the > original submission, get it committed with the comment that the > package needs to be compiled rather than copied, when someone (or I) > wants to so properly? > > Cheers, > Yasu > > > > On Jan 10, 2021, at 18:16, Leo Prikler < > > leo.prik...@student.tugraz.at> wrote: > > > > Hello Vincent, > > > > there is no .tar of the fonts however, that's a source tarball > > generated by github. To be fair, one should probably build this > > font > > (and other fonts) from source instead. In particular, we might > > want to > > package nerd-fonts[1] first, since Cascadia appears to be an > > iteration > > of it. > > > > Regards, > > Leo > > > > [1] https://github.com/ryanoasis/nerd-fonts > > > >