Hi, Mathieu Othacehe <m.othac...@gmail.com> skribis:
>>> But I'd like to avoid that. I'll see if I can figure out something >>> better after a good night. >> >> Couldn't find much better, here's a patch, tell my what you think! > > I pushed a patch removing all canonical-packages calls, except the one > for the default-locales-libcs variable. > > About this variable, I don't know if the dirty patch I proposed is > better than accepting that the glibc used for locales is different from > the one programs are linked against. WDYT? On second thought, I think removing ‘canonical-package’ calls from (gnu system locale) should work. What matters there is that we build locales with the matching libc (same version, not necessarily same store item.) The only downside will be potentially an extra glibc download/build to build the locale set, but that’s probably OK. WDYT? Thanks, Ludo’.
