Hello David,
> I actually have two ways of fixing it though and am unsure which is > more appropriate. The non-controversial one is to just get the > libstdc++ header directory for the default gcc and patch clang to look > there. However, as an end user of the clang package I would rather have > a make-clang-toolchain procedure that takes a gcc-toolchain version and > gets the standard library from that. I've got implementations of both > of these, does anyone have an opinion which one would be preferred? At first glace, the second option seems better but don't hesitate to post both versions and we'll discuss them :) Thanks, Mathieu