Hi, This patch doesn't work for me as it seems to have a similar issue finding the libc++ headers.
I do have a fix for the libstdc++ header issue though, I'm just trying to clean up the patch and then will send it to paches-guix. It involves patching the source, so will trigger a rebuild of anything depending on clang (however it doesn't touch llvm). I haven't yet worked out a way of fixing libc++ but it should be fixable in a similar way. I actually have two ways of fixing it though and am unsure which is more appropriate. The non-controversial one is to just get the libstdc++ header directory for the default gcc and patch clang to look there. However, as an end user of the clang package I would rather have a make-clang-toolchain procedure that takes a gcc-toolchain version and gets the standard library from that. I've got implementations of both of these, does anyone have an opinion which one would be preferred? David Truby IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
