Dnia 2019-10-27, o godz. 19:18:19 Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> napisał(a):
> Thanks for the update! :) > Which failing patch and what fails? Output? Sorry, I sent a mail explaining everything yesterday, but it seems it got lost somewhere - your or mine mail provider does something (blocks?) or the ML has a bug. Reposting it here, hope this time it'll work: Dnia 2019-10-26, o godz. 12:12:44 Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> napisał(a): > Nice, thank you for getting in touch with the developers, this is > very informative. > > Have you tried using pjproject > 5dfa75be7d69047387f9b0436dd9492bbbf03fe4 ? > Does the patching still fail? I've tried this today and it still fails. Don't know if the fails with the exact commit are much different from 2.9 fetched from the tarball. If they're not different, then you can see what happens in one of my comments here https://git.ring.cx/savoirfairelinux/ring-project/issues/691 > Also it now depends on Restinio, I think we are missing this one, so > it would need to be packaged first. (But that's unrelated to the > patch issue.) I'm going to package it eventually, but for now I want to fix the current problems and then proceed with the rest. Jan Wielkiewicz
