Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis: > >> Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> writes: >> >>> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes: >>> >>>> I suppose /etc/pam.d/ also needs to be in the container. >>> >>> Tried it, same error. >>> >>>>> What about defaulting to 1000? It's rather common, so I guess that >>>>> would be anonymous enough and "just work". >>>> >>>> Would it make sense to map the current user’s UID into the container >>>> instead of using a fixed UID? >>> >>> We have a "--user" option, so we could use the current user's UID when >>> --user is not specified, 1000 otherwise. >>> Or better: add a --uid CLI option. >> >> I can see confusion coming from the existence of both “--user” and >> “--uid”. Maybe “--user” could take an optional argument, with the >> default being the current user. Without “--user” we’d use UID 1000. > > Currently, without --user, we keep the current user’s name. So it would > actually be consistent to inherit its UID as well. And with ‘--user’, > we’d use the given user name and UID 1000. (Essentially what Pierre > proposed above.) Excellent, this sounds good. -- Ricardo
