Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes: > >> I suppose /etc/pam.d/ also needs to be in the container. > > Tried it, same error. > >>> What about defaulting to 1000? It's rather common, so I guess that >>> would be anonymous enough and "just work". >> >> Would it make sense to map the current user’s UID into the container >> instead of using a fixed UID? > > We have a "--user" option, so we could use the current user's UID when > --user is not specified, 1000 otherwise. > Or better: add a --uid CLI option. I can see confusion coming from the existence of both “--user” and “--uid”. Maybe “--user” could take an optional argument, with the default being the current user. Without “--user” we’d use UID 1000. What do you think? -- Ricardo
