18.02.2019, 14:44, "Tobias Geerinckx-Rice" <someb...@not-sent-or-endorsed-by.tobias.gr>: > If this is the quality of argument that ‘won’ over PureOS, it's > blaming Guix/Ricardo for not being around to stop others from > being bullied. > > Kind regards, > > T G-R
Hi Tobias, I've been reading this conversation from the outside but noticed it seems to be shifting to a meta rather than about the state of chromium itself so it would be nice if it went back on topic. Seeing as the issue here relates to being uncertain shouldn't upstream confirm which parts run under what license in more detail? As I can tell so far this hasn't been done (unless I've missed something) thus the current situation. So the choice here is really about following the FSDG for now until it's revised or going against it causing a split in the community around it. Guix would be in the right but depending on the result there's a chance for a negative return (or a positive one). Are most here sure which direction it will go? From just reading the snippets about PureOS they seemed to have gotten quite a bit of flack until it was removed, won't the same happen to Guix? I've enjoyed using Guix for a bit over a year now and will continue regardless of the outcome. I apologize if this email is in conflict with the standard format as I usually don't engage in responding to mailing lists so my interpretation of the desired style might not be as accurate as of yet. Thank you Simon Nielsen
