On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:18:58 -0500 Julie wrote: > In justice > systems, we adopt an "innocent until proven guilty" system because you > can't really prove innocence, only guilt.
i wondered if someone would bring that up - there is a huge difference with this (and i have already made this clear, BTW) - the default state for copyright is not "innocent" - the default state is "no permission granted" - according to this analogy, software is guilty until proven innocent under the existing copyright laws - that is not something we can decide to re-interpret On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:18:58 -0500 Julie wrote: > As far as I know, and correct > me if I'm wrong here, no one in the entire history of this claim yes they have - the original bug report noted several; and those were said to be fixed On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:18:58 -0500 Julie wrote: > this, though, then it seems to me that the correct action to take > would be to address that issue, if not upstream, then in a fork. i agree - at the very least, i would to see that original bug report closed by the upstream - its continued presence is looms ominously and dubiously
