Hello, Gábor Boskovits writes:
> I have a feeling that I might confuse some things, as this thread is > getting rather long, so let me summarize what I have on my mind so > far: > > 1. There is general consensus that having both CoC and GKCG is pointless. > 2. CoC is not welcome by all, mainly because they feel that it > discourages contributions. > 3. GKCG seems to be inadequate in the opinion of the maintainers, as: > a. it does not define acceptable behaviour, and > b. it does not define processes. > > My conclusion is that neither document really cuts the bill. > > I proposed to try to roll our own, essentially based on GKCG, > but have the acceptable behaviour and the processes defined. > > Do you think this can/should be done? > Do you think that this could result in a better situation overall? I appreciate the motivation behind this effort. Personally I think it is better to stick with a widely used, and fairly robust policy. In addition, rolling our own will be a very long, exhausting process, and we'll likely end up with a document that still doesn't please everyone. Just my 2¢. Alex > > Best regards, > g_bor
