Am 06.04.2018 um 14:12 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > The point here is that in the library case inputs must be propagated, > whereas in the case where only the executables are used the inputs don’t > have to be propagated. > > Separating them in two outputs doesn’t address this problem as far as I > can see. Using the venv-based wrapper I describe in <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-02/msg00456.html could avoid propagating for the scripts - but not for the libs.
IMHO it does not make much sense having "script" packages without propagation, as we still need "libs" packages with propagation. Even if "deeptools:script" would not propagate its inputs, "somepackage:lib" (required by "deeptools:script") would still need to propagate its inputs. Thus nothing gained. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
