> It wouldn’t really help in that mescc+/guilecc is just as capable as the > earlier mescc, no? There is however a real difference in terms of performance, guile is simply faster
> Indeed, Guile needs a C compiler. Technically, it could be built from a lisp compiler > In general, we need a C compiler early on… unless we have replacements for > Bash Rain1 is working on that > Coreutils, etc. written in Guile or Mes, which would allow us to strip bits > of the tip of the DAG. Actually we only need a core subset of coreutils that mescc can compile, which ironically is a small job should one use openbsd's core as a base Essentially build from the stage0-seed to mescc, build the essentials only, then simply add pieces as we need them. No need to make this any more complex than it already is.
