Heya, Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis:
>>> Here are some important items I can think of: > […] >>> • Guile 2.2 compiler terrible issue: >>> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2017-05/msg00033.html>. I should mention that I spent entire days on this, and some of the conclusions are described here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2017-09/msg00031.html https://bugs.gnu.org/28590 I invite the Guilers among us to join the fun. :-) A bug that serious is a problem for Guile. >From a Guix perspective, we have to find alternate solutions to improve scalability anyway: https://bugs.gnu.org/27284 >>> • Prepare to migrate to the new build farm: the hardware of >>> bayfront.guixsd.org has been fixed (it was unreliable until we >>> changed its CPUs), so now we need to fix a couple of issues in >>> Cuirass and generally improve it so we can, via its HTTP interface, >>> add new jobsets and so on. Of course we’ll have to work >>> on that incrementally. > > I guess we’ll be using berlin.guixsd.org instead of bayfront, no? Yes. > I’m currently installing additional servers (we’re now at 13 build > servers, I’ll get this up to 18 this week). Woohoo, thank you! >>> • Merge the potluck! <https://bugs.gnu.org/26645> > > About that… We now have a JSON importer, so maybe it’s worth using the > even simpler JSON package format instead of the simplified S-expression > format that Andy proposed. What do you think? Should we discuss this > at <https://bugs.gnu.org/26645>? Yeah I think we need to reopen the discussion. We discussed it at the GHM but this should take place here on guix-devel I guess. > Who would like to help us squash some bugs before the release? Let’s > try to fix at least 5 more bugs! Yes, let’s squash bugs! There are many ways people can help, and one of them is triage: close bugs that are already fixed, determine whether old bugs are still relevant and close those that are obsolete, retitle bugs to better reflect what the problem is, ping people asking for more information. After that, there are more-or-less “easy” packaging bugs in the list that can be a good starting point. Thanks, Ludo’.
