2017-03-07 13:09 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net>: > > Catonano <caton...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Wrapping up, I think 2 interesting ideas popped up in this thread > > > > One is the automation of building of new packages patches > > I wouldn’t know how to set this up. Hydra isn’t powerful enough for our > *current* purposes, so I wouldn’t want to increase the load at this > point. >
Ok :-) > > > Another one is the weekly report about pending patches and merged > >patches > > I’d rather not have a weekly report (I get enough email through the > various Guix mailing lists already). The debbugs interface shows all > open patches already. (We should get more people to use guix-patches > instead of guix-devel, though.) > Ok ! This is also what Ludo is proposing > > Other than that I’d like to second everything Leo has written. > Sure ! I didn't mean to put off anyone's work ! If that was your impression I apologize, I gave the wrong impression ! I agree with Pjotr that obviously it would be nice to have faster/more > reviews/mentoring. That’s something everybody can help with, even if it > is just a matter of reviewing licenses or trying to build or run the > package. But this all falls apart under stress (speaking from > experience here), so it’s best not to force it. > I reviewed one patch only so far, so I take your word for it I am gearing up with a viable email service and soon I'll be able to use the Emacs-Debbugs thing to its full potential ;-)
