Hi Pjotr! Pjotr Prins <pjotr.publi...@thebird.nl> skribis:
> Now we have debbugs we can see there is a building back-log: > > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=guix-patches;max-bugs=100;base-order=1;bug-rev=1 > > A patch like this one > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25725 > > has been two weeks without comment. I think we should not leave patches > without > feedback longer than one week - even 3 days, to be honest. It is the surest > way > to kill enthusiasm. I’ll echo what others wrote: we don’t want to put more pressure on those who do that review work. The last thing I’d want is someone burning out because of that; it’s already hard enough, believe me. However, we should try hard to balance the review workload more evenly among the 30 committers. I’m not sure how to incentivize that, though; some projects add Reviewed-by tags and then publish stats; would that help? A reviewer’s hall of a fame? :-) And of course, we should have more committers. > Would it be an idea to send out weekly E-mails with patches that had > no attention to a select list of reviewers? Or maybe to the ML as a > whole? Basically it would read: Personally I would not use that, but if others want it, we should set it up! Thanks, Ludo’.
