Hi, All, Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
> Danny Milosavljevic (2017-02-14 18:56 +0100) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> One problem of this solution is that some font packages (for example, >>> fonts-misc-misc) already have fonts.dir, to avoid conflict, it is better >>> to remove fonts.dir in all font packages and generate fonts.dir in >>> fonts-dir-file, I think that is good. But I don't know whether others >>> think that is a good idea. >> >> If it can happen that multiple packages install to share/fonts/<xxx> >> (certainly true for share/fonts/truetype and probably true for other >> <format>-directories) and fonts.dir then is conflicting (and doesn't >> ever contain all the entries of the directory), I think that your idea >> is very good (and how it was done before is dead wrong). > > I completely agree; removing all "fonts.dir" and "fonts.alias" files > from packages and regenerating them at profile time looks like a good > idea to me. Good to know this. I will implement it as this. Best Regards, Huang, Ying
