Hi, > One problem of this solution is that some font packages (for example, > fonts-misc-misc) already have fonts.dir, to avoid conflict, it is better > to remove fonts.dir in all font packages and generate fonts.dir in > fonts-dir-file, I think that is good. But I don't know whether others > think that is a good idea.
If it can happen that multiple packages install to share/fonts/<xxx> (certainly true for share/fonts/truetype and probably true for other <format>-directories) and fonts.dir then is conflicting (and doesn't ever contain all the entries of the directory), I think that your idea is very good (and how it was done before is dead wrong).
