On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 08:20:26PM +1000, Brendan Tildesley wrote: > I'm not a fan of "quickswitch-for-i3" and "python-i3-py". Perhaps a > better solution is to ensure "i3-py" in the description or synopsis so > that `guix package -s' finds it. As for quickswitch, isn't the upstream > name also simply "quickswitch-i3"?
Our packaging guidelines say that we should use the "project name chosen upstream" [0], which in this case appears to be quickswitch-for-i3 [1]. And python-i3-py does follow our conventions for naming Python modules [2]. [0] https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Package-Naming.html [1] https://github.com/proxypoke/quickswitch-for-i3 [2] https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Python-Modules.html
