ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes:
>> In this case we should probably split these changes up as they are not
>> related to one another. Alternatively, the summary line should be
>> changed to apply to all of the changes in this patch.
>
> Can you give me an example how the summary line should look like then?
I just checked the git log but couldn’t find a similar package in which
changes of this magnitude were summarised in one commit.
I suggest splitting this up. Actually, though, I think the description
doesn’t need changing. I only suggested removing the sentence because I
assumed that the package didn’t yet exist. There’s no harm in keeping
it.
Without the description change it’s really just one thing that has been
changed:
gnu: femtolisp: Remove custom "patch-makefile" phase.
* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (femtolisp)[arguments]: Remove
"patch-makefile" phase; specify test target; build "release"
target instead of "default".
What do you think?
~~ Ricardo
