Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes:
> ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>
>> ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>>
>>> [ Unknown signature status ]
>>> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>> I hope the appended patch still applies.
>>>>
>>>> could you please send a new, complete patch?
>>>>
>>>> You seem to have removed the “#t” from the “install” phase
>>>> accidentally. The return value should be kept.
>>>>
>>>> ~~ Ricardo
>>
>> Sorry, I'm not sure if I had sent the updated patch or not. The change
>> is so small.
>
> I’m sorry for the confusion. Looking at the subject of these emails I
> assumed that this patch was supposed to *add* a *new* package, not
> modify an existing one. I didn’t know that an earlier version had
> already been pushed.
No problem.
> In this case we should probably split these changes up as they are not
> related to one another. Alternatively, the summary line should be
> changed to apply to all of the changes in this patch.
Can you give me an example how the summary line should look like then?
> ~~ Ricardo
>
>
--
ng0
