Kenton Varda <ken...@sandstorm.io> writes: > Hi, Cap'n Proto upstream author here. Noticed this thread in a Google > search, thought I'd comment. > > To shed some light on the googletest situation: > > The googletest maintainers have deemed that googletest should never > ever be system-installed, and have even disabled `make install` in > their build. See: > > https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/Makefile.am#L300 > > I don't really understand what they think they're solving here but it > is what it is and this seems to make it hard to use googletest in a > non-bundled way. It's possible I misunderstood, though.
Hi, thanks for dropping in! >From reading the comments in the Makefile, apparently they are trying to enforce something called the One-Definition Rule: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Definition_Rule The way Guix (and actually most distro build systems) works makes it impossible for another definition to "leak" into the build container, so I don't understand either what they are trying to solve. > FWIW, Cap'n Proto only uses googletest to build its tests. It does not > install any artifacts that were influenced by googletest. > > In any case, this dependency will be gone once I find time to do the > next release. Sorry for the trouble in the meantime. No worries, can't blame you for bundling something clearly designed to be bundled. It's usually easier to remove, though ;) > PS. regarding the man page, I believe Debian mostly generated this > page from the capnp tool's help text. I'd accept a patch to > c++/src/kj/main.c++ which adds some code to generate man XML format > directly, so that we don't have to maintain the same text in multiple > places. I'm guessing it's the issue I opened that sent you here :) My C++ fu is not strong enough to embark on that journey, but maybe if you mention it in the ticket someone may pick it up. Thanks for the feedback! Marius