On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:52:37AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > > > I pushed the patch as 5f0ff6a9e. Hopefully dlib is still useful without > > lapack. We should really figure out what the issue is and fix it :) > > I noticed this fails to build on Hydra. What's worse is that the i686, > x86_64 and armhf targets fails at completely different things. armhf and > i686 exits cleanly after failing 2 and 5 tests respectively, while the > x86_64 target seems to get the segfault we saw with lapack in inputs. > > What should we do? I'd prefer to keep the package so it can easily be > tested on various architectures, but can understand if it is reverted. > Perhaps we can disable substitutes or tests, to stop bothering Hydra? > > I'll try reproducing it this weekend on various qemu configurations.
Let us know about the results of your tests. Then we can decide what to do.
