Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 09:52:40AM +0000, ng0 wrote: >> Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: >> > Okay, then I think we should add the package with a comment that says >> > it's unmaintained. What do you think of the attached patch? >> >> Looks good to me. This way if some old application should require >> libunique, we have it. I'll also ask about libunique at gnunet-devel >> list with some other applications I need to question. As far as I >> understand Christian, they want to avoid external dependencies where >> possible. A ifcase for gnunet-gtk is in the HEAD of gnunet-gtk. > > What does your last sentence mean?
I should be more precise and provide context to statements. I am sorry. I meant this: https://gnunet.org/svn/gnunet-gtk/src/fs/gnunet-fs-gtk.c /** * @file src/fs/gnunet-fs-gtk.c * @brief Main function of gnunet-fs-gtk * @author Christian Grothoff */ #include "gnunet-fs-gtk.h" #include "gnunet-fs-gtk_common.h" #include "gnunet-fs-gtk_event-handler.h" #include "gnunet-fs-gtk_open-uri.h" #if HAVE_LIBUNIQUE #include <unique/unique.h> #endif and similar inclusions. By the way, I've asked about specific dependencies here (https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=4618 ), including libunique. -- ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
