On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 09:52:40AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > > Okay, then I think we should add the package with a comment that says > > it's unmaintained. What do you think of the attached patch? > > Looks good to me. This way if some old application should require > libunique, we have it. I'll also ask about libunique at gnunet-devel > list with some other applications I need to question. As far as I > understand Christian, they want to avoid external dependencies where > possible. A ifcase for gnunet-gtk is in the HEAD of gnunet-gtk.
What does your last sentence mean?
